Wednesday, June 11, 2008

Summer 2009



As much as we complain about big budget sequels, "Hollywood" movies and the clear lack of originality of the films churned out year after year, we are always duped into anticipating said blockbuster sequels made by one of the big Hollywood studios hoping that the movie will match the hype accompanying it. I remember when the trailer for The Phantom Menace was released in 1998 and how everyone was so excited about it people were paying money to see movies they had no interest in watching for the sole purpose of watching said trailer. The hype, of course, surpassed the movie itself tenfold, but the anticipation made it all very, very exciting.

So what movie am I here to hype about that will surely disappoint when released on May 22, 2009? Terminator Salvation: The Future Begins. I've always said that a Terminator sequel, without time traveling, was the way to go if they wished to expand the series. By the time the third movie arrived, whether you call it a Flaming Moe or a Flaming Meaux, the drink still tastes the same. And since there is an interesting back story to the whole trilogy we haven't seen yet: the battle of the humans vs. the machines in a post-apocalyptic war zone complete with laser beams, hey, I love it already.

Of course, there are concerns. For instance, there is no Arnold. And the director's name is McG. WTF? Amusingly, his blog on the Warner Brothers website is kinda funny as he admits it's pretty lame but says that's what he was called to differentiate himself from his Uncle and Grandfather who shared the same name, and to change it now would be "fraudulent". Guess it's no worse than SBP...

If the movie sells tickets, two other sequels will be made and Christian Bale has committed to all three films as the hero John Connor should they be made. The first film will introduce us to the rubber-skinned T-600 series as described by Kyle Reese in the first Terminator movie, and will show how Skynet patrols the earth to bring humans to the brink of extinction. Can't wait to see how it unfolds: please oh please be good!

Comments:
I had very little faith in this production (director and title are both WEAK) but the fact that Bale signed on for three makes me a bit hopeful that it *could* be good.

Reviews will have to be off-the-charts good though.
 
Could you imagine the buzz if Cameron were back directing? His first film since Titanic, back to the story that made him famous: the hype would be off the charts. Unfortunately, McG is just "talking" to him, whatever that means, and the film is in the hands of an inexperienced director. It's enough to make you nervous.
 
Especially for someone who loves the franchise and won't even give the TV show a try because it doesn't fit your ideal vision. Yeah, I guess you're nervous!

I read a rumour last week (that turned out to be false, supposedly) about the plotline for the trilogy, and it was off the charts dumb. And yet, I could totally see McG pitch the idea, and get the backing to make it.

As I said, Bale's signing on made me a little optimistic, but I think it'll have to succeed *despite* McG's involvement...
 
Weird, didn't mean to post anonymously. That's my handiwork above...
 
Post a Comment

Subscribe to Post Comments [Atom]





<< Home

This page is powered by Blogger. Isn't yours?

Subscribe to Posts [Atom]