Monday, July 10, 2006
Mach 9 Takes Flight to Chicago
Along with SBP punching doll Bryan Smolinski, the Sens dealt Martin Havlat to the Chicago Blackhawks in exchange for Tom Priessing, Josh Hennesy a prospect and a 2nd round pick in next year's draft. Martin Havlat quickly changed his mind about wanting to pursue the free agent market next year by signing a 3 year, $18 million dollar deal with the 'Hawks.
As a fan, I'm hoping this move is used to sign someone else as a bunch of cap room just became open. With this move, about $5 million of salary cap room was made available. If they don't sign someone else, they could have easily kept Zdeno Chara and not lose him to Boston for nothing. So, we'll see what happens (if anything) in the next few days.
I'm not terribly impressed with Martin Havlat right now. I guess if such a big contract was offered to me, I'd probably sign it, too. But once the season was finished he essentially declared he had no interest in playing for Ottawa anymore. Make no mistake, he could have stayed in Ottawa if he wanted to, and would have made more than the $2.6 million he made last year for the 30 games he played. He can rot in Chicago. They will not make the playoffs again next season if they are pinning their hopes on this 25 year old. The deal he signed is the sort of money you'd figure he'd make later on in his career, but not now. The NHL must loathe this contract, and you have to wonder what the lockout accomplished when an injury prone player with only 5 seasons experience is already making $6 million a year. And as someone else pointed out to me, you'd figure Chicago would learn something after signing big money deals to Khabibulin and Aucoin last year.
Martin Havlat was an exciting player to watch, and he was a potent offensive weapon when he was on. But, no one plays for the same franchise year after year anymore. For that reason, perhaps this trade isn't all that surprising. That's pro sports for you.
Comments:
<< Home
I agree with everything you say, but I also find it funny that Muckler was talking about how they're being penalized by not being able to keep their drafted talent. Wasn't this the same team that was complaining a few years back that they couldn't compete with the Detroits and New Yorks because they had too much money to spend on free agents? Double standard?
I found it funny that Muckler was complaining about the Sens being penalized by not being able to keep their drafted talent...when barely any of that drafted talent (Eaves is one) was chosen by him. Remember, he INHERITED a stacked line-up with tons of assets and is doing a terrific job screwing it all up.
Do something smart Mucks and bring in Peca for a hometown discount of $7 million a year.
Do something smart Mucks and bring in Peca for a hometown discount of $7 million a year.
"And as someone else pointed out to me, you'd figure Chicago would learn something after signing big money deals to Khabibulin and Aucoin last year."
You know....that someone else is a very handsome man.
You know....that someone else is a very handsome man.
Item the first: If there was no cap, Ottawa would have lost Chara and Havlat anyway because they couldn't afford them. The drawback of the cap is that good drafting teams like Ottawa are punished. But, they're a small market team and cannot keep all their stars, whether it's cap or affordability. C'est la vie. I like a cap system as opposed to the alternative, the team being called the Portland Senators.
Item the second: Surely indeed, a truly handsome fellow.
Post a Comment
Item the second: Surely indeed, a truly handsome fellow.
Subscribe to Post Comments [Atom]
<< Home
Subscribe to Posts [Atom]